Spring 1945 • Vol. VII No. 2 NonfictionApril 1, 1945 |

The Sense of the Present

It is proof of our respect for a critic that he sometimes forces us to disagree with him. We can even admire him most and learn most from him, if he is a good critic, at the very moment he repels us most. And so if I mention T. S. Eliot in this essay only to disagree with him, that is not because I want to depreciate his contribution to literature but, on the contrary, because I think him still the most central and enlightening critic of an important school of writers. I must admit a certain diffidence in using the term "school of writers," and that term will have to be left somewhat vague. The school is at least vague enough to include D. H. Lawrence, Mann, Yeats, Jung, Joyce, Toynbee, and Eliot himself. What these writers have in common is—in the most general sense—that they have turned to primitive myth in search of faith, of philosophy, and of aesthetic norms. Finnegans Wake, the most exhaustive of all poetical researches into the relation between primitive and modern man, i

Already have an account? Login

Join KR for even more to read.

Register for a free account to read five free pieces a month from our current issue and digital archive.
Register for Free and Read This Piece

Or become a subscriber today and get complete, immediate access to our digital archives at every subscription level.
Richard Chase (1914-1962) was a literary critic and a Professor of English at Columbia University. He is known for his work The American Novel and Its Tradition.

Read More


Your free registration with Kenyon review incudes access to exclusive content, early access to program registration, and more.


With your support, we’ll continue 
to cultivate talent and publish extraordinary literature from diverse voices around the world.